Possibly the Most Illogical Statement Ever Made
So fucking retarded.
The belief that our media problems are the result of the coincidental incompetence of a very large number of separate individuals is quite a silly one, no?
As long ago as 1984 I starting realizing that the vast majority of bright Ivy Leaguers think of school primarily as a place to have fun and to "network". They had only a moderate work ethic and no high intellectual ambitions, but definitely wanted the good life. They may have respected a Nobel physicist earning $200,000 a year slightly more than a TV personality earning the same amount, but they knew they were too lazy and dumb for physics.
But they were verbally fluent and quite rightly felt that they would be able to figure out what the audience wanted and what the bosses wanted. The best of these floated to the top, and the American hive mind is, in fact, being massaged very effectively. And that sells a lot of advertising.
And even smart, hardworking people often would rather be celebrities than scholars. I blame the counterculture and drug use.
For Mrs. Hied, a meter reader, and her husband, Michael, an office manager for a local bus and transport company, the Dover school board's argument - that teaching intelligent design is a free-speech issue - has a strong appeal.
"I think we as Americans, regardless of our beliefs, should be able to freely access information, because people fought and died for our freedoms," Mrs. Hied said over a family dinner last week at their home, where the front door is decorated with a small bell and a plaque proclaiming, "Let Freedom Ring."
Why does any of this matter? Because we think individuals (and political movements) owe a trust to average, ordinary, normal people—the kind of people we were raised by, the trusting kind, who are easily fooled. Over the course of the past fifteen years, the average voter has been played for a fool by the Koppels, the Mitchells, the Matthewses, the Riches. (And the Gerths, the Cecis, the Kits and the Brunis.) We think liberals owe those voters a trust—a trust that, when they come to our sites, they won’t be met by embellished facts and by the stupidest possible “logic.” (We found a single photo caption! We think you should be totally furious!!) We’ve been disgusted, in the past dozen years, to see the public abused as it’s been. And yes, it fills us with disgust when we see our side adopting these practices. We can be just as dumb as they are, our conduct sometimes seems to portend.
"My own feeling is that the right approach is to build on the strengths: to recognize what's healthy and solid about having not hundreds, but thousands of flowers blooming all over the place--people with parallel concerns, maybe differently focused, but at the core ... similiar values and a similiar interest in empowerment, in learning, in helping people understand how to defend themselves against external power and take control of their own lives, in reaching out your hand to people who need it. All the things that you people have talked about--that's a common array of concerns. And the fact that there's a tremendous diversity can be a real advantage--it can be a real way of learning, of learning about yourself, and what you care about, and what you want to do, and so on. But of course, if it's going to bring about real change, that broad array of concerns is going to require some form of integration and inter-communication and collaboration among its various sub-parts...
...in the end, there really are only small changes that can be made within the existing institutions--because they've got their own commitments, which are basically to private power. In the case of the media, they have a committment to indoctrination in the interests of power, and that imposes pretty strict lmits on what they can do.
So the answer is, we've got to create alternatives, and the alternatives have got to integrate these lots and lots of different interests and concerns into a movement--or maybe not one necessarily, which somebody could then cut the head off of, but a series of interconnected ones: lots of associations of people with similiar concerns, who've got in mind the other people next door who have related concerns, and who can get together with them to work for changes. Maybe then we can ultimately construct serious alternative media... serious in scale, at the point where they can consistently present people with a different picture of the world, a picture different than the one you get from an indoctrination system based on private control over resources."
-Noam Chomsky, Understanding Power
At the Royal Sonesta, the hotel employees and two German tourists still there are sleeping on thick mattresses covered with clean sheets.
At the Convention Center, Diane Lee and her family have been sleeping on the sidewalk rather than sleep inside near the dead bodies.
"We're living like dogs," Lee said. "And we're being left to die like dogs."